Don't let the "dish bag" become a takeaway terminator_深圳蒲圈 - 蒲友论坛_蒲友宝典桑拿社区

Don't let the "dish bag" become a takeaway terminator

分类: 蒲友桑拿 发布时间: 2018-08-10 09:32

Have you ever thought that the order you took out is not sold now, but is heated with a vacuum dish bag? According to reports, several take-out platforms in Chengdu, a large number of online infrared stores have no dine, using dishes: some use, and some are used together. Most of the dishes are available for a period of three months to six months. The take-away merchants said that the use of the food package is a standardization requirement after the increase of the store. "It is easy to copy and develop, the product safety is more controllable, and the efficiency is high."
 

The controversy over the sale of the food package is mainly concentrated on two points: first of all, the quality, these take-away dishes are not produced in the factory but in the factory. I wonder if the workshop of the production factory can meet the "kitchen standard", whether there is any relevant qualification, will it be Meet the requirements? If this problem does not exist, then the shelf life of these dishes is as long as three months to six months. Has such a long shelf life been demonstrated? What is the nature and security?
 

If there is no problem with the quality, then the next second focus is to inform. Some lawyers believe that according to the Consumer Protection Law, the right to know includes the place of production, date, quality, specifications, etc., and does not include the processing of food. Some lawyers also believe that the use of reheat packs by operators exceeds the general public's consumption cognition and does not meet the requirements of the law for complete and accurate notification of operating commodities. It can be seen from this that there is still no controversy surrounding the issue of notification, and relevant parties should give an authoritative explanation.
 

Before the law was issued, it seems that the problem will fall into no solution, but for food, there is ethics outside the law. As far as the average consumer is concerned, it may not be possible to think that the takeaway of the point is not the current sale, but from the heating of the dishes. Even if the merchant’s uninformed behavior succeeds in hitting the legal edge, it can’t conceal the fact that it is unethical. For basic business ethics, the merchant should also subjectively inform. Some people may say that in business talks, it is tantamount to telling morals to some merchants. It can be said that business, this behavior has also buried a huge hidden danger.
 

In the context of the Internet economy, many people like to say: It is not an opponent who defeats you, and it is not a peer who subverts you. For example, the decline of instant noodles is accustomed to the rise of the takeaway industry. I wonder if the take-away industry has thought that the current "dish package" is actually equivalent to the instant noodles in the past. The more accurate name should be "convenience dish". Isn't this the case? Produce a “dish package” through the factory, and then heat it up when you use it. Nowadays, the take-out platform and the take-out store use the information advantage. With the media reports, the information inequality will inevitably be lost. Why do consumers not directly purchase the “convenience dish”, but the “intellectual tax” through the take-out platform and the take-away store? ? Takeaway dishes are likely to become the industry's terminator.
 

Being able to pass the consumer, "convenience dishes" still have merit. As long as it solves the quality problem, it is likely to open a market that is far away from the world. Just like the current “ instant noodles”, the future “convenience dishes” will also enter thousands of households, and the advantages of take-out platforms and take-away stores will be one. Never return. Compared with the “convenience dish”, the advantages of the take-out platform and the take-out store are in the taste and quality advantage of the current structure, even if this advantage is only taken for granted, it is also an advantage. Self-request, proactive notification, is also to maintain industry characteristics and shape industry advantages. I really can't understand, not only the take-out store, but even the take-away platform did not see the potential threat, even gave up their own advantages.
 

From the business model, the takeaway food package is likely to be an amazing innovation. As long as the food safety is ensured and the nutrition is delicious, it is likely to usher in a development period. In essence, the current advantages of the catering industry and the take-out platform are actually based on the current sales, and the abandonment of the current sale means giving up its own advantages. The dish package is a big stone. Let the take-away dishes pack up and down in the morning and evening. “Do not know how to take care of the take-away industry. Is it responsible for the consumers, and let consumers understand that consumption is also for their own tomorrow?